Should we open up comments and membership here?

Submitted by tng on Fri, 2005-11-25 20:58.
What do you think? Allow commenting and membership? That means they get to see the forums too, unless we install organic groups and keep a couple private. If we allow commenting, should we allow Anonymous comments?
|

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Gouri (not verified) Says:
Tue, 2009-12-01 00:56

I've been at the AlwaysOn OnDC conference, and I just heard an interesting speech from legendary venture capitalist Tim Draper.
Draper was a key figure in the launch of Skype, Baidu, and many other
companies that took off. He also was an early developer of the concept
of viral marketing.

mcitp ... mcitp training ... mcse

Timmy (not verified) Says:
Sat, 2009-11-21 00:28

Marketing to promote UpStarts, a new JN0-532 and HP0-J14 programme designed to raise awareness of the UpStarts programme of NS0-501 across the word. We hope this will do a big business.

tng Says:
Wed, 2005-12-14 23:00
It creates a certain measure of peer review too. If someone totally f's up their responsibilities as a host they are likely to get called on it.
 
Should there be a couple of hosts only forums though? Because otherwise, everything (including what we're discussing right now) will be out in the open. I've been using organic groups successfully at my site and it seems to work well for this sort of thing.
 
Should there be a couple of forums open to the public for posting as well? 

Paul -V- Says:
Tue, 2005-12-13 20:09

Anyone who hosts a CotL should have access to the forums.  In this way, if anyone drops the ball it can easily be picked up by a past host who knows what they are doing.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.